What we'll do is change to a moving coordinate system, which goes with the velocity of the center of mass! That's sounds weird. It makes the problem sound evem harder. But actually you'll see how simple things look in this frame.
Remember we said that if momentum is conserved, the center of
mass velocity of the system is also. As the collision
is taking place, it doesn't alter the motion of the center of
mass a bit. It just plods along at a constant velocity. If
we were coasting along on a bike at this center of mass
velocity, watching the collision, what would we see?
Well in this reference frame, the center of mass velocity,
by definition, is zero. And therefore by eqn. 1.37
the total momentum is also zero. I'll notate all variables
in this new system the same as the old, but just to remind
ourselves that we're in this new frame I'll also add
" ' " to them. So for example, the initial momentum of thr first
particle is denoted .
So let's play before and after again, but this time in the center of mass reference frame.
This looks a lot simpler. The momentum equations say that the particles
have equal and opposite momenta, and
Using this, equating energy is almost as easy
Factoring the masses and cancelling gives . There
are two solutions to this. One is kind of boring,
. It
means that before and after, nothing changes. This certainly obeys conservation
of energy and momentum, but means that the particles haven't bounced off
each other. So what's the other more interesting solution? It's
. From conservation of momentum, that means
. In terms of velocity this gives
This says that after the collision, the two balls have reversed their initial velocities. That's it. This satisfies both momentum and energy conservation.